Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

L1T DQM Ignore BX range mismatch in OMTF to uGMT comparison - 101x #22793

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 7, 2018

Conversation

thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #22771

Ignore BX range mismatch in OMTF to uGMT comparison in L1T DQM.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 29, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for CMSSW_10_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/L1TMonitor
DQM/L1TMonitorClient

@vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@kreczko this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 29, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/27180/console Started: 2018/03/29 10:41

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 867ef65

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22793/27180/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: AddOn

  • AddOn:

I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsDriver.py TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_cfi --conditions auto:run2_mc_l1stage1 --fast -n 100 --eventcontent AODSIM,DQM --relval 100000,1000 -s GEN,SIM,RECOBEFMIX,DIGI:pdigi_valid,L1,DIGI2RAW,L1Reco,RECO,EI,VALIDATION --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RECO,DQMIO --beamspot NominalCollision2015 --era Run2_25ns : FAILED - time: date Thu Mar 29 12:16:06 2018-date Thu Mar 29 12:10:04 2018 s - exit: 16640

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

Error was unrelated to the code.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 29, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/27188/console Started: 2018/03/29 14:05

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22793/27188/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 29
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2501822
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2501642
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.820000000043 KiB( 23 files compared)
  • Checked 119 log files, 9 edm output root files, 29 DQM output files

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

type backport

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 3, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Apr 7, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit b29ec1e into cms-sw:CMSSW_10_1_X Apr 7, 2018
@thomreis thomreis deleted the l1t_dqm_ugmt_config_fix2 branch August 20, 2018 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants