New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Module name fix for SingleMuon and Charmonium skims for T0 (10_1_X back port) #22965
Module name fix for SingleMuon and Charmonium skims for T0 (10_1_X back port) #22965
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @kfjack (Kai-Feng Chen) for CMSSW_10_1_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Skimming @GurpreetSinghChahal, @cmsbuild, @prebello, @fabozzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test workflow 136.835,136.848 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 @deguio FYI |
Module name fix to follow the standard convention (SKIMStream+skim name) for T0 operation.
Back port from PR #22964