Fix a few gcc 4.9.0 issues

[ktf]

No description provided.

[ktf]

This should fix a good fraction of the remaining gcc 4.9.0 errors. Notice that one of the problems seems to be related to a "regression" in gcc 4.9.0. If I understand correctly the problem is that it adheres better to the standard, but the standard specification itself might be buggy. Not sure how we want to proceed there.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ktf (Giulio Eulisse) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

Fix a few gcc 4.9.0 issues

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/CondDB
FWCore/Framework
FWCore/Services

@apfeiffer1, @Dr15Jones, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @ggovi, @Degano, @ktf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @wmtan this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

-1
I ran the usual tests and I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test runtestTqafTopEventProducers had ERRORS
---> test runtestTqafTopKinFitter had ERRORS
---> test runtestPhysicsToolsPatAlgos had ERRORS
---> test runtestTqafExamples had ERRORS

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2322/49/summary.html

[ktf]

das glitch, I guess...

[cmsbuild]

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2322/57/summary.html

[apfeiffer1]

+1

[ktf]

+1
Chris I assume from our discussions last week you do not object?

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IBs unless changes (tests are also fine).

[Dr15Jones]

It was fine with me.