New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CTPPS: strips mapping for 2018 #23356
CTPPS: strips mapping for 2018 #23356
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @forthommel (Laurent Forthomme) for CMSSW_10_1_X. It involves the following packages: CondFormats/CTPPSReadoutObjects @perrotta, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @slava77, @ggovi, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@slava77 correct! even though the strips tackled in this very PR are located in the vertical pots (which are of course safely stored away from the beam at high-lumi...) |
@fabiocos Is there anything we can do to help the review for this backport PR? |
@forthommel I plan to merge all the CTPPS related backports together into a single version when we are ready for the move |
@forthommel
If I am not mistaken, #23354 is just #23352 plus the DQM part.
If so, we can probably speed up things and avoid rebases if we just
merge #23354 (once fully signed) instead of #23352 + rebase + #23354.
Laurent Forthomme <notifications@github.com> ha scritto:
… @fabiocos Many thanks! Let us know whenever you are ready for this
big-merge, as I am expecting a rebase needed for the DQM one
(#23354) once #23352 is merged.
--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#23356 (comment)
|
Successfully tested and integrated in the Online DQM at P5. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/DQMP5TagCollector |
+1 |
backport of #23119
This PR updates the mapping for Totem strip detectors for dedicated 90m run.
In more detail: one fiber was damaged and it was swapped with a working one in one of the detector packages that is not installed anymore.
Runs during the alignment fill can be used for the tests, for example run 314277.