New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleanups to DQMStore #23562
Cleanups to DQMStore #23562
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
@schneiml, @Dr15Jones FYI |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23562/5152 |
A new Pull Request was created by @knoepfel (Kyle Knoepfel) for master. It involves the following packages: DQMServices/Core @vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Thanks @knoepfel! For the functional changes, we should maybe have a chat/meeting at some point. Our plans on how to restructure |
Yes, @schneiml, having a chat would be good. Next week is looking pretty open for me. If it works well for you, let me know which days/times are good to meet, and we can set up a meeting. |
@jfernan2 we did talk a bit at CHEP, but not specifically about this. Actually, I think we can go ahead with this PR -- early 10_3 cycle is also a perfect time for such things. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@knoepfel now once we get this in, we should also look at the original PR again. Early 10_3 would again be the right time for bigger changes. If you are busy with other things, we can do the porting to a new PR -- let us know. |
+1 |
@schneiml yes, let's look at the overall plan again. I'm on vacation next week, but I'll try to get ahold of you the week of Aug. 6. |
As discussed in PR #22949, this PR contains only cleanups, and no functional changes--i.e. there are no underlying changes to the
DQMStore
representation.There should be no breaking changes to user code or workflows.