Pileup scenario for 2018 using an extrapolation of data to date.

[plujan]

This uses the 2018 data so far, extrapolated over the rest of the year. For more details see the slides here: https://indico.cern.ch/event/737811/contributions/3045257/attachments/1670000/2678601/pu_projections_2018_june.pdf

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23613/5233

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @plujan (Paul Lujan) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/StandardSequences
SimGeneral/MixingModule

@civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[plujan]

Hi all,

I just learned that the distribution here has not yet been smeared as we planned, so I'll get that updated as soon as possible.

Sorry for the inconvenience!

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23613/5243

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #23613 was updated. @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[plujan]

The file now includes the properly smeared version. Here's the plot of the distributions:

[franzoni]

hi @plujan , thanks for this.

"Summer18" is already taken as a name:
it's the ongoing MC campaign based on 10_1 .

Would it be possible to rename this scenario, to avoid mis-understanding pls.
"JuneProjectionFull18", or a better idea ?

Including PdmV convenors who master the naming of 10_2 based MC campaign
@fabozzi @prebello @GurpreetSinghChahal

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[plujan]

Sure, done! Also, tested with cmsDriver to make sure everything actually works, and it looks fine.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #23613 was updated. @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[fabiocos]

please test

testing nothing in reality, I do not see a way to do it from the bot until this scenario is not put as default for some test wf

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28755/console Started: 2018/06/19 10:12

[plujan]

@fabiocos Yeah agreed -- I just tested it by picking a random workflow and changing the cmsDriver command to include the new scenario, but there's not really much more that can be done.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 421136a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23613/28755/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23613/28755/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2902013
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2901822
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
• Checked 128 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

[civanch]

+1

[fabiocos]

+operations

simple addition of a new PU scenario to StandardSequences

[fabiocos]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

[franzoni]

Tks!!