Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Run2-hcx180 Fix a bug for HcalDetId which affects DQM of calibration channels" #23739

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 4, 2018

Conversation

fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@fabiocos fabiocos commented Jul 4, 2018

Reverts #23688

This fix is causing a list of reproducible crashes in the IB CMSSW_9_4_X_2018-07-03-2300 in 2016 workflows within DQM with the exception

----- Begin Fatal Exception 04-Jul-2018 10:09:31 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Conditions not found' occurred while
[0] Processing Event run: 283877 lumi: 17 event: 27631378 stream: 1
[1] Running path 'dqmoffline_step'
[2] Calling method for module DigiTask/'digiTask'
Exception Message:
Unavailable Conditions of type HcalQIEData for cell (0x4e280440) (CastorRadFacility 1 / 2 / 0)
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

triggered from

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/CondFormats/CastorObjects/interface/CastorCondObjectContainer.h#0090

as used in the module https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/DQM/HcalTasks/python/DigiTask.py for what I can see.

I temporarily revert it, pending a clarification and a fix for this problem.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

fabiocos commented Jul 4, 2018

@bsunanda FYI

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_9_4_X milestone Jul 4, 2018
@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

fabiocos commented Jul 4, 2018

please test workflow 136.77,136.775,136.779

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for CMSSW_9_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/HcalDetId

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @mariadalfonso, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28999/console Started: 2018/07/04 10:47

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 4, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23739/28999/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-23739/136.775_RunSingleEl2016H+RunSingleEl2016H+HLTDR2_2016+RECODR2_2016reHLT_Prompt+HARVESTDR2
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-23739/136.779_RunMuOnia2016H+RunMuOnia2016H+HLTDR2_2016+RECODR2_2016reHLT_skimMuOnia_Prompt+HARVESTDR2
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-23739/136.77_RunDoubleEG2016H+RunDoubleEG2016H+HLTDR2_2016+RECODR2_2016reHLT_skimDoubleEG_Prompt+HARVESTDR2

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2721493
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 105
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2721226
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 162
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

fabiocos commented Jul 4, 2018

+1

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

fabiocos commented Jul 4, 2018

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d325d4f into CMSSW_9_4_X Jul 4, 2018
@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

bsunanda commented Jul 5, 2018

I believe this bug fix has opened up a bug in the DQM system which is supposed not to look into condition objects for some of the special DetId's. These are the ones for CRF channels. I believe the current code is good but the DQM code involving condition objects for the special channels needs a fix. It is good that this is exposed. The code for 8_0_X will not face this because the CRF channels did not exist in the data for that period.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor Author

fabiocos commented Jul 6, 2018

@bsunanda thanks, in any case if this backport is desired, the whole chain should be functional. @DryRun I guess you are looking after the HCAL DQM, could you please check?

@DryRun
Copy link
Contributor

DryRun commented Jul 6, 2018

Hi @fabiocos, yes, I'll try to check this today!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants