-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bug in FormulaEvaluator involving parenthesis and precedence order #24049
Conversation
This can aid in debugging problems.
A sub-expression involving a parenthesis was not using the top node as the representation for the expression. That mixed with precedence order fixing resulted in part of the expression being lost.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-24049/5736 |
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: CommonTools/Utils @perrotta, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @gpetruc, @arizzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Changes vary somewhat by the type of processing:
in 2016 reminiAOD ZEE wf 1325.5 Changes are a bit mixed in data So, it's somewhat up and down depending on the JECs. Anyways, perhaps more interesting illustrations were posted in #24023 e.g. http://uaf-10.t2.ucsd.edu/%7Enamin/dump/issue_24023/plot_unclipped.png |
+1 |
merge |
A sub-expression involving a parenthesis was not using the top node as the representation for the expression. That mixed with precedence order fixing resulted in part of the expression being lost.