Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in FormulaEvaluator involving parenthesis and precedence order #24049

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 1, 2018

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

A sub-expression involving a parenthesis was not using the top node as the representation for the expression. That mixed with precedence order fixing resulted in part of the expression being lost.

This can aid in debugging problems.
A sub-expression involving a parenthesis was not using the top
node as the representation for the expression. That mixed with
precedence order fixing resulted in part of the expression being
lost.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/Utils

@perrotta, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @gpetruc, @arizzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 25, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/29459/console Started: 2018/07/25 21:38

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24049/29459/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 616 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2889585
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1749
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2887646
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 128 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 1, 2018

Changes vary somewhat by the type of processing:

  • almost no change in 2017 MC re-miniAOD
  • somewhat significant changes in 2016 MC re-miniAOD

in 2016 reminiAOD ZEE wf 1325.5
all_sign1031vsorig_zee13reminiaodwf1325p5c_log10patjets_slimmedjets__pat_obj_energy
all_sign1031vsorig_zee13reminiaodwf1325p5c_log10patjets_slimmedjets__pat_obj_et
not much visible effect for pt >~20 GeV
wf1325 5_slimjets_resp_eta_20to40

Changes are a bit mixed in data

  • 136.7611 wf 2016E JetHT
    all_sign1031vsorig_runjetht2016ereminiaodwf136p7611c_log10patjets_slimmedjets__pat_obj_et
  • 136.8311 wf 2017F JetHT
    all_sign1031vsorig_runjetht2017freminiaod136p8311c_log10patjets_slimmedjets__pat_obj_et

So, it's somewhat up and down depending on the JECs.

Anyways, perhaps more interesting illustrations were posted in #24023 e.g. http://uaf-10.t2.ucsd.edu/%7Enamin/dump/issue_24023/plot_unclipped.png

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 1, 2018

+1

for #24049 611a792

  • code change is in line with the description; there are also quite a bit of debug functionality added. The problematic cases were added to the unit tests.
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show changes in miniAOD variables related to jets

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Aug 1, 2018

+1

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Aug 1, 2018

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit a14867e into cms-sw:master Aug 1, 2018
@Dr15Jones Dr15Jones deleted the fixFormulaEvaluator branch August 2, 2018 17:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants