-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HCAL: HF SIM update for >= Run2 #25155
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25155/7151 |
A new Pull Request was created by @abdoulline (Salavat Abdullin) for master. It involves the following packages: SimCalorimetry/HcalSimProducers @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
@abdoulline @civanch I guess that the large bunch of changes in the DQM plots is driven by a modification in the Geant4 event history, I do not see why HF digis should affect tracking plots , am I correct? |
Yes Fabio, this is my perception - GEANT rndm changed.
That was visible in old tests of the changes implemented in this PR -
namely even ECAL SimHits changed all over ECAL
https://cms-cpt-software.web.cern.ch/cms-cpt-software/General/Validation/SVSuite/HCAL/calo_scan_single_pi/HF_10_2_X/10_2_0_pre6_newHF3_vs_10_2_0_pre6_SinglePi/SimHitsTask_emean_vs_ieta_E.gif
…On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Fabio Cossutti wrote:
@abdoulline @civanch I guess that the large bunch of changes in the DQM plots is driven by a modification in the Geant4 event
history, I do not see why HF digis should affect tracking plots , am I correct?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.[AEx02p8Fv3SkdIpqbZx-ijd51MLknBG0ks5uu7pBgaJpZM4YS0eg.gif]
|
+1 |
@abdoulline , @fabiocos , the line responsible for history change: |
Follow up on a discussion back in August at HCAL DPG meeting
https://indico.cern.ch/event/745475/contributions/3080994/attachments/1697133/2732028/HF_MC_Update_Aug3_2018_v3.pdf
Some more plots will be presented at HCAL DPG this Friday (Nov.9)
https://indico.cern.ch/event/768831/
Doesn't change much HF energy scale, while improves low-energy (single p.e. domain) agreement of HF spectrum with data.