-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ecal TPG Weights definition by strip number #25510
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25510/7680 |
A new Pull Request was created by @depasse for master. It involves the following packages: CondTools/Ecal @ggovi, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
edm::LogInfo("got offlineInfo = "); | ||
edm::LogInfo("tag name = ") << tagInfo().name; | ||
edm::LogInfo("size = ") << tagInfo().size; | ||
std::cout << "got offlineInfo = " << std::endl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the edm::LogInfo ( which is the correct way to implement logging ) has been turned to std::cout statements?
-1 Tested at: 747f665 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: UnitTests
I found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test EcalTPGWeightGroup_O2O_test had ERRORS |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
code-checks |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25510/7886
|
+1 |
Before, in Ecal, it was only a distinction between EB/EE. But we have to refine the granularity due to the big variation of laser transparency in the crystals.