Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow SiStripBadModuleConfigurableFakeESSource to mask single APVs #25578

Merged

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Jan 3, 2019

Greetings,
this Pull Request aims to introduce the possibility to produce SiStrip Bad Component payloads, by masking selected single APVs as opposed to the current behavior which allows to mask only entire SiStrip modules. This feature has been useful when creating test SiStrip Bad component payloads in preparation of the 2018 Heavy Ion data-taking, to study the effect on tracking of removing selected problematic APVs (which during data-taking with the tracker in Hybrid mode, were always being readout non zero-suppressed).
I profit of this PR to introduce also a unit test for the SiStripBadModuleConfigurableFakeESSource module, which is used to produce SiStrip Bad Component payload for MC production.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 3, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 3, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 3, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CalibTracker/SiStripESProducers

@cmsbuild, @franzoni, @pohsun, @tocheng, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echabert, @mmusich, @pieterdavid, @gbenelli, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor

tocheng commented Jan 5, 2019

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 5, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32417/console Started: 2019/01/05 13:09

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 5, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 5, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 5, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25578/32417/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3153717
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3153511
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 204
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jan 15, 2019

Hi @tocheng is there any outstanding issue with this PR?

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor

tocheng commented Jan 15, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

code-checks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25578/8036

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d072730 into cms-sw:master Jan 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants