Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for BTL Bar simulation #25635

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Fixes for BTL Bar simulation #25635

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2019

Conversation

pmeridian
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes to properly address the BTLBar simulation after the indroduction of the barphiflat configuration. Without this fix this layout is treated as the barzflat.

Also fixes a simple cut& paste mistake where LightCollSlopeR_ was used instead of LightCollSlopeL_. This has no effect since the 2 values are the same.

@lgray @casarsa

- properly addressing barphiflat
- lightSlopeColl L&R cut & paste mistake
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25635/7952

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @pmeridian for master.

It involves the following packages:

SimFastTiming/FastTimingCommon

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@pmeridian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

please test workflow 27434.0,27834.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 12, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32551/console Started: 2019/01/12 16:07

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

thank you @pmeridian , I had adjusted the definition of boundRef but I had overlooked this point.

As we discussed, printing the topology mode and pitch first and second dimensions (x and y according to https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/Geometry/MTDGeometryBuilder/interface/RectangularMTDTopology.h#0174 )

for scenario D35 (barzflat) one gets Topology mode = 3 x = 0.287656 y = 6.05
for scenario D38 (barphiflat) one gets Topology mode = 4 x = 6.13333 y = 0.32625
So the fix correctly takes into account the orientation of the strip to define longer size of the bar.

Checking the repository there is no other explicit dependency on the value of the CrysLayout in the code, so this fix should be enough to get correct behaviour.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25635/32551/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25635/27834.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D38_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D38+RecoFullGlobal_2023D38+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D38

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3153717
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3153500
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 204
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jan 14, 2019

+1

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@kpedro88 is this ok for you? This is a bug fix, not critical for the official production as D38 is not used there, but important for all the internal studies

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants