Disable Rivet beam check

[mseidel42]

Disable beam check to work for heavy ions and non-standard generators (LPAIR)

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25734/8125

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @intrepid42 (Markus Seidel) for master.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/RivetInterface

@alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @perrozzi, @efeyazgan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @agrohsje, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[srimanob]

Confirm that it helps to the Rivet issue reported in
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/prep-ops/6123.html

This will need backport to 10_2 for NanoAOD production.

[efeyazgan]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32766/console Started: 2019/01/22 14:28

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6597910
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25734/32766/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25734/32766/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3097440
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3097242
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[efeyazgan]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1

[srimanob]

@intrepid42 @efeyazgan @qliphy
Could you please prepare the backport? We need it, at least, in 10_2.
Thx.

[mseidel42]

Sure, done! #25766