Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

keep phase2_timing_layer functional #25745

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 24, 2019

Conversation

bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

phase2_timing_layer era when used without phase2_timing_layer_tile or phase_2_timing_layer_bar does not include mtd global reco, and therefore the downstream changes to the 4d vertex reconstruction, etc to use fullsim inputs should not be activated in this case.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25745/8142

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bendavid (Josh Bendavid) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
RecoVertex/Configuration
Validation/RecoTrack

@perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @wmtford, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @lgray, @bachtis, @hatakeyamak, @ebrondol, @VinInn, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @seemasharmafnal, @cbernet this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 23, 2019

@cmsbuild please test workflow 20434.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 23, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32789/console Started: 2019/01/23 14:23

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 232a533

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
0265928
5b2fe81
7074981
8b6f399
43c7c1c
e3f2a95
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25745/32789/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25745/32789/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25745/32789/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: AddOn

  • AddOn:

I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsDriver.py TTbar_8TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_cfi --conditions auto:run1_mc --fast -n 100 --eventcontent AODSIM,DQM --relval 100000,1000 -s GEN,SIM,RECOBEFMIX,DIGI:pdigi_valid,L1,DIGI2RAW,L1Reco,RECO,EI,VALIDATION --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RECO,DQMIO --beamspot Realistic8TeVCollision : FAILED - time: date Wed Jan 23 16:53:15 2019-date Wed Jan 23 16:48:36 2019 s - exit: 35584

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
0265928
5b2fe81
7074981
8b6f399
43c7c1c
e3f2a95
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25745/32789/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25745/32789/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor Author

(the failure here looks unrelated to this PR)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25745/32789/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3097440
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3097242
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

In a private test of mine I manage to run without crashes the failing test

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@kpedro88 concerning you remark #25628 (comment) : that is ok with me, it would allow us to keep a common part and separate just the digitization, although it looks ultimately aesthetics. I would keep it for a separate PR though, as it needs to touch also other parts of the code

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25745/32818/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3097440
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3097242
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@schneiml
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Minor changes to Validation config.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade
problem observed in #25628 is fixed
modifier implementation can be simplified later

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jan 24, 2019

+1

for #25745 232a533

  • code changes are in line with the PR description in order to correctly leave phase2_timing_layer parts intact
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no differences

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 409d602 into cms-sw:master Jan 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants