Update VtxSmearingScenario for 10_6_X MC production - Round Optics

[francescobrivio]

Update the VtxSmearingScenario parameters for 10_6_X MC production.
Two different configurations are created to test the possible beamspot conditions during Run3 using round optics.
The same BeamSpot (run 316199, fill 6675) and Barycenter (from Payload Inspector https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/payload_inspector/Prod ) positions are used in both configurations.
The two configurations only differ by the sigmaZ:

1. LowSigmaZ --> sigmaZ = 3.4 cm
2. HighSigmaZ --> sigma> = 5.7 cm

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26140/8709

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences
IOMC/EventVertexGenerators

@pgunnell, @prebello, @zhenhu, @civanch, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mdhildreth, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[srimanob]

@francescobrivio
Maybe you can change the subject and description, as current master is 10_6.

Is backport needed?

[francescobrivio]

@srimanob
Subject and description changed.
A backport is not needed.

[mtosi]

ciao
apologies for this low level question, but this PR is introducing changes in a file I was not expecting
it is
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py

in addition, I see the commnet on the missing new line at the end of file for both
IOMC/EventVertexGenerators/python/VtxSmearedRun3RoundOptics25ns13TeVHighSigmaZ_cfi.py
and
IOMC/EventVertexGenerators/python/VtxSmearedRun3RoundOptics25ns13TeVLowSigmaZ_cfi.py

[kpedro88]

Base branch for this PR is 10_5, needs to be rebased to 10_6

[prebello]

@mtosi maybe @fabiocos can explain why my commits on relval_step from 24 days ago is appearing in this PR :-)

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[francescobrivio]

As suggested, I rebased to 10_6

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26140/8721

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #26140 was updated. @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[mtosi]

as expected, the rebase fixed the file I pointed in my previous comment ;) thanks

[civanch]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/33547/console Started: 2019/03/12 17:29

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 895ce5b
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26140/33547/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26140/33547/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 3 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3114829
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3114631
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[fabiocos]

+operations

the update of StandardSequences is coherent with the purpose of the PR

[civanch]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1