Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interface for external Pyquen #4790 #26226

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 2, 2019
Merged

Interface for external Pyquen #4790 #26226

merged 3 commits into from Apr 2, 2019

Conversation

wouf
Copy link
Contributor

@wouf wouf commented Mar 20, 2019

Interface for Pyquen as external generator. Should be merged together with cms-sw/cmsdist#4790

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26226/8849

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @wouf for master.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/PyquenInterface

@alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @efeyazgan, @perrozzi, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @cbaus, @agrohsje, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@wouf
Copy link
Contributor Author

wouf commented Mar 21, 2019

I mean that this PR should be merged simultaneously with cms-sw/cmsdist#4790

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

davidlange6 commented Mar 21, 2019 via email

@wouf
Copy link
Contributor Author

wouf commented Mar 21, 2019

We needn't it anymore. I replace it with external one. I deleted pyquen.F, HepEvt.F and hepevt.inc files in this interface changes.

why does cmssw itself need pyquen.F?

On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:45 AM, wouf @.***> wrote: I mean that this PR should be merged simultaneously with cms-sw/cmsdist#4790 — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

davidlange6 commented Mar 21, 2019 via email

@wouf
Copy link
Contributor Author

wouf commented Mar 21, 2019 via email

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

davidlange6 commented Mar 21, 2019 via email

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

please test workflow 301.0 with cms-sw/cmsdist#4790

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26226/33711/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-26226/301.0_Pyquen_DiJet_pt80to120_2760GeV+Pyquen_DiJet_pt80to120_2760GeV+DIGIHIMIX+RECOHIMIX+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3114829
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3114631
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 27, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Using externals from cms-sw/cmsdist#4790
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/33791/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #26226 was updated. @alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @efeyazgan, @perrozzi, @qliphy can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26226/33791/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-26226/301.0_Pyquen_DiJet_pt80to120_2760GeV+Pyquen_DiJet_pt80to120_2760GeV+DIGIHIMIX+RECOHIMIX+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3114829
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3114631
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@wouf is it ok to completely remove the definition of HEPEVT COMMON size? This was just previously set to 4000 as in the external definition...

@wouf
Copy link
Contributor Author

wouf commented Mar 27, 2019

@fabiocos by default it's 4000 (I printed it like HepMC::HEPEVT_Wrapper::max_number_entries() )I'm not sure from which place this number coming from, but it looks like from SimDataFormats/GeneratorProducts
I moved manual setting HepMC::HEPEVT_Wrapper::set_max_number_entries(10000) because of decay vertex warning. I don't like this solution, because of without string HepMC::HEPEVT_Wrapper::set_max_number_entries(10000) - inconsistency HEPEVT warning is happens from time to time (it's clearly seen on 500 events). It was in old PyquenInerface too. It looks like to solve both of this issue we have to change SimDataFormats/GeneratorProducts section (data/stdhep.inc?). Please inform me if You know other solution, or can explain the connection of set_max_number_entries and vertex issue...

@alberto-sanchez
Copy link
Member

@fabiocos any comment?

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Apr 2, 2019

unhold

@cmsbuild cmsbuild removed the hold label Apr 2, 2019
@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Apr 2, 2019

@alberto-sanchez @wouf as far as I understand now the COMMON size should be consistenly 4000. Error messages look gone, so I would suggest to move forward.

@alberto-sanchez
Copy link
Member

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 2, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Apr 2, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1152681 into cms-sw:master Apr 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants