add standard prod-like 2018 relvals w/ and w/o b-parking

[srimanob]

PR description:

This PR is to add PROD-Like RelVals for 2018, which MINIAOD is produced separately from RECO step. 2 MC relvals_standard workflows are added (w/ and w/o bParking).

Note that PROD-like wfs for 2016/2017 are not PROD-LIKE, as MINIAOD (PAT) runs in the same step as RECO,
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py#L2197-L2199

https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_standard.py#L19-L31

However, I don't touch them at this moment. This PR focus on Prod-like with bParking in 2018.

PR validation:

w/o b-parking; run out of the box

runTheMatrix.py --what standard -l 1304.18 -t 8 --noCaf --wm init

w/ b-parking; run with #26325

runTheMatrix.py --what standard -l 1304.181 -t 8 --noCaf --wm init

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

• verify that the PR is really intended for the chosen branch
• verify that changes follow CMS Naming, Coding, And Style Rules
• verify that the PR passes the basic test procedure suggested in the CMSSW PR instructions

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26365/9102

• This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@cmsbuild, @zhenhu, @prebello, @pgunnell, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[prebello]

please test workflow 1304.18,1304.181

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/33991/console Started: 2019/04/05 12:21

[srimanob]

@prebello
1304.181 will fail, you need to trigger the test with #26325

[srimanob]

@fabiocos
Do you want to have this in regular test? As the prod-like workflows will not produce any plot, not clear to me we should add. Thx.

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: d410adb

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26365/33991/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

• RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
101.0 step1

runTheMatrix-results/101.0_SingleElectronE120EHCAL+SingleElectronE120EHCAL/step1_SingleElectronE120EHCAL+SingleElectronE120EHCAL.log

1304.181 step4

runTheMatrix-results/1304.181_ProdZEE_13UP18+ProdZEE_13UP18+DIGIUP18PROD1+RECOPRODUP18bParking+MINIAODMCUP18bParking/step4_ProdZEE_13UP18+ProdZEE_13UP18+DIGIUP18PROD1+RECOPRODUP18bParking+MINIAODMCUP18bParking.log

[cmsbuild]

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

[prebello]

please test workflow 1304.181 with #26325

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) #26325
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/34015/console Started: 2019/04/05 22:36

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: d410adb
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26365/34015/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
9d895fa
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26365/34015/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26365/34015/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26365/34015/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-26365/1304.181_ProdZEE_13UP18+ProdZEE_13UP18+DIGIUP18PROD1+RECOPRODUP18bParking+MINIAODMCUP18bParking
• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-26365/1304.18_ProdZEE_13UP18+ProdZEE_13UP18+DIGIUP18PROD1+RECOPRODUP18+MINIAODMCUP18

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3140495
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3140297
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[fabiocos]

For what I can see the test launched in #26325 using these new workflows is successful (at least it runs and I do not see complaints in the log files)

[fabiocos]

@prebello @zhenhu @kpedro88 comments?

[kpedro88]

+upgrade

[zhenhu]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1