Additional Photos options (9_4_X)

[mseidel42]

PR description:

Backport of #26853

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @intrepid42 (Markus Seidel) for CMSSW_9_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/PhotosInterface

@alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @agrohsje, @efeyazgan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @agrohsje, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[qliphy]

@intrepid42 Why 94X instead of 93X?

[mseidel42]

I think it's used for 5 TeV and low PU? Will create 93X and 71X* as well!

* 71X seems to require Photos update...

[qliphy]

@intrepid42 ok, I see.

[qliphy]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/411/console Started: 2019/05/22 11:18

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 06075cd
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e23fa0/411/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e23fa0/411/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2721493
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 115
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2721216
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 162
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0

[efeyazgan]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

@intrepid42 @efeyazgan do we have production requests in 9_4_X requiring this PR?

[mseidel42]

Hi Fabio, not yet, maybe in a couple of months.

[fabiocos]

+1