-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modernized ESProducers in TrackingTools/KalmanUpdators #27484
Conversation
Just pass the bool instead to the constructor.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27484/10815
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: TrackingTools/KalmanUpdators @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
TrackingTools/KalmanUpdators/plugins/TrackingRecHitPropagatorESProducer.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
TrackingTools/KalmanUpdators/plugins/TrackingRecHitPropagatorESProducer.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
-Removed headers and put declaration in .cc files -Removed use of module.cc file -Pulled out parameters in constructor -Wrote fillDescriptions -Used edm::ESGetToken
10959a7
to
67cbe90
Compare
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27484/10840
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
part of #26748 |
PR description:
PR validation:
The code compiles. This is a refactoring and should not change any results.