Tracker Alignment: implement PV resolution analysis in the all-in-one tool

[mmusich]

PR description:

The aim of this PR is to introduce the PV resolution analysis in the standard battery of the Tracker Alignment offline validation checks.
The new analyzer SplitVertexResolution is added to the Alignment/OfflineValidation package. It implements the PV resolution analysis using the "split vertex method". In the current implementation it is fully interlaced in the "all-in-one" validation meta-tool (waiting for a better implementation of the job submission which is currently in the works).

PR validation:

Relies on the old and new unit / tests, though private larger scale tests using phase-0 and phase-1 pixel data have been carried out.
Some example plots are collected below:

• resolution vs number of tracks
  

• pulls vs number of offline vertices in the event:
  

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

This PR is not a backport and no backport is intended
cc
@connorpa @vbotta

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28923/13722

• This PR adds an extra 216KB to repository

• Found files with invalid states:

  • Alignment/OfflineValidation/plugins/PrimaryVertexResolution.cc:
    • Added: aa6b1c8
    • Modified: fd9d256, d113df0, d03e687, be24ea8
    • Deleted: d24d94e

[christopheralanwest]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4603/console Started: 2020/02/11 16:34

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/OfflineValidation

@christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @mmusich, @adewit, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 8259a31
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ea0535/4603/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-02-10-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ea0535/4603/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2694005
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2693658
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 346
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[pohsun]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1