Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changing handling of color indexes and anti particle creation for pythia8 EGun #29000

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Feb 29, 2020
Merged

Changing handling of color indexes and anti particle creation for pythia8 EGun #29000

merged 7 commits into from Feb 29, 2020

Conversation

pasmuss
Copy link

@pasmuss pasmuss commented Feb 19, 2020

PR description:

Changes for proper treatment of color (conservation and codes):

  • Increasing color index after generating one particle (anti particle obtains the same color, just on the anticolor column)
  • Adding a check that if only colored particles are generated, the AddAntiParticle option is used to make sure that all colors are balanced
  • Only affecting pythia8 EGun

PR validation:

Ran some tests locally with a core CMSSW script:

  • not set AddAntiParticle at all (does not start, option must be set)
  • set option to False (runs but does not generate anything and throws errors)
  • set option to True (as expected: anti particle gets same anti color as particle gets color, index is not the same for two different particles)

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

@pasmuss pasmuss changed the title From cmssw 11 1 0 pre2 Changing handling of color indexes and anti particle creation for pythia8 EGun Feb 19, 2020
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

ping

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29000/13845

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29000/13849

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @pasmuss for master.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/Pythia8Interface

@SiewYan, @efeyazgan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @agrohsje, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

please tests

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 25, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4868/console Started: 2020/02/25 15:38

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29000/13928

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #29000 was updated. @SiewYan, @efeyazgan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez, @qliphy can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29000/13929

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@agrohsje
Copy link

logic looks good to me. @qliphy do you mind checking and signing?

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 27, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 27, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4916/console Started: 2020/02/27 17:01

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 95a7d7a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-433dd4/4916/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-02-27-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-433dd4/4916/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2679706
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2679386
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 29, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants