Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PPS: simulation input from GenParticleCollection #29046

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2020

Conversation

jan-kaspar
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR adds a possibility to run fast ("direct") forward-proton simulation starting with GenParticleCollection, for details see https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/TaggedProtonsDirectSimulation.

No changes are expected in the results of the standard workflows.

PR validation:

Since the updated module is not present in the standard sequences, tests with runTheMatrix were not performed.

Instead, the new functionality was tested with this config file:
https://github.com/CTPPS/cmssw/tree/pps_zx_mc_10_6/test-simu-GenParticle

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29046/13913

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

  • There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jan-kaspar for master.

It involves the following packages:

IOMC/EventVertexGenerators

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Feb 26, 2020

please test

@jan-kaspar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

Have the tests actually been triggered? I can't see any results...

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Feb 27, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 27, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4911/console Started: 2020/02/27 11:25

@jan-kaspar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @civanch !

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 435e55c
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a6d98f/4911/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-02-26-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a6d98f/4911/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-a6d98f/11634.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_2021_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2021+RecoFull_2021+HARVESTFull_2021+ALCAFull_2021
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-a6d98f/12434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_2023_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2023+RecoFull_2023+HARVESTFull_2023+ALCAFull_2023
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-a6d98f/20034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_2026D35_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2026D35+RecoFullGlobal_2026D35+HARVESTFullGlobal_2026D35
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-a6d98f/20434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_2026D41_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2026D41+RecoFullGlobal_2026D41+HARVESTFullGlobal_2026D41
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-a6d98f/21234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_2026D44_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2026D44+RecoFullGlobal_2026D44+HARVESTFullGlobal_2026D44
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-a6d98f/23234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_2026D49_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2026D49+RecoFullGlobal_2026D49+HARVESTFullGlobal_2026D49

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2679706
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2679385
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@jan-kaspar
Copy link
Contributor Author

As mentioned here: #29037 (comment), it could be helpful to get this PR merged as fast as reasonable to address the conflicts in the other PR. Thanks in advance!

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Feb 28, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit fdbf5a3 into cms-sw:master Feb 28, 2020
cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2020
PPS: simulation input from GenParticleCollection (backport of #29046 to 10_6_X)
@jan-kaspar jan-kaspar deleted the pps_gen_particle_input_11_1 branch March 2, 2020 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants