Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of inverse beta variable in pat::Muons for 10_6_X #29324

Merged

Conversation

cericeci
Copy link

PR description:

This is a (long overdue) backport of #28212 to 10_6_X in order to save the inverse beta (timing variable) of pat::muons. We discussed this-very briefly- this in a reco meeting a couple of months ago. As it's been some time should I raise it again next time?

Our goal would be to have it as part of a possible UL re-miniAOD. Should I also comment on issue #27889 ?

PR validation:

Same tests as the original PR:
No compilation errors or of battery of tests from
runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Backport of #28212 to include the feature in reminiAOD of UL

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 27, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @cericeci (Carlos Erice) for CMSSW_10_6_X.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/PatCandidates
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @santocch, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @gouskos, @hatakeyamak, @emilbols, @peruzzim, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @ahinzmann, @smoortga, @jdolen, @ferencek, @rovere, @jdamgov, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @clelange, @riga, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @mverzett, @cbernet, @gpetruc, @andrzejnovak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Mar 27, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 27, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5413/console Started: 2020/03/27 18:18

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Mar 27, 2020

Our goal would be to have it as part of a possible UL re-miniAOD. Should I also comment on issue #27889 ?

sure, please. Thank you.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #28212

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: ae74db1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-32a58d/5413/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2020-03-27-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-32a58d/5413/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3212324
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211955
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@santocch
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #29324 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @santocch, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@cericeci
Copy link
Author

Either the master needs an update first or this PR needs an update to re-introduce addInverseBeta

I reintroduced addInverseBeta back again, in fact I checked out the files back from the previous (rebased from master) commit. I was overzealous in removing the effects of the reminiAOD era modifier.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 14, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 14, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5689/console Started: 2020/04/14 17:53

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 9347528
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-32a58d/5689/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2020-04-14-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-32a58d/5689/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3212324
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 15
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211975
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 14, 2020

+1

for #29324 9347528

  • the backport is now consistent with the master version of Propagate inverse beta variable to pat muons (muon POG) #28212 . Since this adds a new variable to the pat::Muon, I think that it should be fine to fill it as in the master version, without additional modifiers to disable filling by default.
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons show no [relevant] differences (old/existing variables are not affected)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

do you have comments @santocch?

@slava77 slava77 mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2020
41 tasks
@santocch
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 5f7e7c8 into cms-sw:CMSSW_10_6_X Apr 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants