Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add back TrackingParticle Selector to digitization. Change pT threshold... #2964

Conversation

mdhildreth
Copy link
Contributor

... to 100 MeV, widen eta acceptance to +/-5

No significant increase in TrackingParticle size is seen with these changes over a pT cut of 200 MeV and an eta acceptance of +/- 2.6

@mdhildreth
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

@mdhildreth
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1
needed to change default for one parameter

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2014
…cle_Selector

Add back TrackingParticle Selector to digitization.  Change pT threshold...
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit f350a55 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_1_X Mar 23, 2014
@@ -4,11 +4,12 @@
trackingParticles.select = cms.PSet(
lipTP = cms.double(1000),
chargedOnlyTP = cms.bool(True),
stableOnlyTP = cms.bool(False),
pdgIdTP = cms.vint32(),
signalOnlyTP = cms.bool(True),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants