Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MillePede: force user to specify cosmics-related settings #29838

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 19, 2020

Conversation

adewit
Copy link
Contributor

@adewit adewit commented May 14, 2020

PR description:

Changes the MillePede alignment setup scripts to force the user to specify certain options which were previously set by default (needed to ensure the settings don't accidentally get copied from elsewhere without the users' knowledge). Should not change any output of CMSSW unit tests.

cc @connorpa @vbotta

PR validation:

Verified (locally) the correct output for setting up the alignment is produced with the proposed changes

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Not a backport

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29838/15375

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @adewit for master.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/MillePedeAlignmentAlgorithm

@cmsbuild, @pohsun, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @tlampen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @mmusich, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor

tocheng commented May 14, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 14, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6302/console Started: 2020/05/14 15:08

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: c46bc3c

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-05-13-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9dbe30/6302/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
136.88811 step2

runTheMatrix-results/136.88811_RunJetHT2018D_reminiaodUL+RunJetHT2018D_reminiaodUL+REMINIAOD_data2018UL+HARVEST2018_REMINIAOD_data2018UL/step2_RunJetHT2018D_reminiaodUL+RunJetHT2018D_reminiaodUL+REMINIAOD_data2018UL+HARVEST2018_REMINIAOD_data2018UL.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

tmpFile = re.sub(cdm_regex,
'setupCosmicsDecoMode = True',
tmpFile)
if dataset["collection"] in ("ALCARECOTkAlCosmicsCTF0T",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@adewit as we have other track collections in the ALCARECO files, and we might add more in view of the work on CDCs I am wondering if this could become a check against a generic ALCARECOTkAlCosmics*.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so - naively would expect I can turn the if statement around... will try a bit later

if config["config"].has_option(section,"cosmicsDecoMode"):
self._datasets[name]["cosmicsDecoMode"] \
= config["config"].getboolean(section,"cosmicsDecoMode")
if self._datasets[name]["collection"] in ("ALCARECOTkAlCosmicsCTF0T",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same as above.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29838/15436

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #29838 was updated. @cmsbuild, @pohsun, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @tlampen can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented May 18, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 18, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6390/console Started: 2020/05/18 15:01

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 47f2840
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9dbe30/6390/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-05-18-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9dbe30/6390/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2694466
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2694369
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 150 log files, 16 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@tlampen
Copy link
Contributor

tlampen commented May 19, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants