Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SiPixelClusterProducer: apply gain calibration scheme update at HLT as well #29951

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 25, 2020

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented May 22, 2020

PR description:

Unfortunately the Pixel gain calibration scheme update introduced at #29333 missed the HLT configuration.
This PR provides the appropriate customization function to deal with the update of conditions also for the HLT.

PR validation:

Dumped the step3 configuration of https://cmsweb.cern.ch/couchdb/reqmgr_config_cache/95d680704ae17507a77b0e3350c8c1d5/configFile with and without this branch and obtained as expected:

$ colordiff dump.py dump2.py 
65455,65458c65455,65458
<     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(47),
<     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(50),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(-60),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(-670),
---
>     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(0),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(0),
65484,65487c65484,65487
<     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(47),
<     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(50),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(-60),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(-670),
---
>     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(0),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(0),
65513,65516c65513,65516
<     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(47),
<     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(50),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(-60),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(-670),
---
>     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(0),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(0),
65542,65545c65542,65545
<     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(47),
<     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(50),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(-60),
<     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(-670),
---
>     VCaltoElectronGain = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronGain_L1 = cms.int32(1),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset = cms.int32(0),
>     VCaltoElectronOffset_L1 = cms.int32(0),

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Not a backport.

cc: @tsusa @dkotlins @tvami

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 22, 2020

type bug-fix

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 22, 2020

urgent

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29951/15600

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/Configuration

@cmsbuild, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 22, 2020

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 22, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6512/console Started: 2020/05/22 14:48

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: e4cefbe
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-da6fcf/6512/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-05-21-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-da6fcf/6512/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2694466
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13188
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2681229
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 150 log files, 16 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@mmusich mmusich force-pushed the fixPixelGainCalibrationAtHLT_29333 branch from e4cefbe to 1afecc5 Compare May 22, 2020 17:53
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 1afecc5

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-05-22-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-da6fcf/6524/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
250202.181 step2

runTheMatrix-results/250202.181_TTbar_13UP18+TTbar_13UP18+PREMIXUP18_PU25+DIGIPRMXLOCALUP18_PU25+RECOPRMXUP18_PU25+HARVESTUP18_PU25/step2_TTbar_13UP18+TTbar_13UP18+PREMIXUP18_PU25+DIGIPRMXLOCALUP18_PU25+RECOPRMXUP18_PU25+HARVESTUP18_PU25.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented May 23, 2020

@cmsbuild, please test

The error message at link looks spurious.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 23, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6536/console Started: 2020/05/23 11:49

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 1afecc5
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-da6fcf/6536/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-05-22-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-da6fcf/6536/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2780792
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13163
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2767579
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit a701bf2 into cms-sw:master May 25, 2020
@mmusich mmusich deleted the fixPixelGainCalibrationAtHLT_29333 branch May 25, 2020 15:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants