Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove CondFormats from DataFormats #30198

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 26, 2020
Merged

Conversation

davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

Minimal move of some enums out of CondFormats/L1TObjects into DataFormats. Removes the incorrect dependency of DataFormats on CondFormats.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30198/16037

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30198/16038

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/L1TObjects
DataFormats/L1GlobalTrigger
DataFormats/PatCandidates
PhysicsTools/NanoAOD

@perrotta, @benkrikler, @slava77, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @fgolf, @tlampen, @ggovi, @pohsun, @santocch, @peruzzim can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gouskos, @cbernet, @rovere, @tocheng, @hatakeyamak, @gpetruc, @mmusich, @peruzzim, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidlange6 commented Jun 11, 2020 via email

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 11, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6967/console Started: 2020/06/11 17:47

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: f8d2412
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ac7da3/6967/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-11-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ac7da3/6967/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2779433
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2779382
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Technical
  • jenkins tests pass

@pohsun
Copy link

pohsun commented Jun 13, 2020

+1

@santocch
Copy link

+1

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

do you have any comments @rekovic @peruzzim @ggovi ?

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Jun 23, 2020

+1

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

@silviodonato - can we move forward in the next days if no further input is expected?

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

merge
@rekovic @peruzzim

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants