Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated TTI customization: keep only the signal TrackingParticles; add c... #3088

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2014

Conversation

EmanuelPerez
Copy link

  • updated customise_Digi_TTI in SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/python/combinedCustoms_TTI.py: keep only TrackingParticles from the main interaction
  • minor update of l1EventContent_TTI and addition of a l1EventContent_TTI_forHLT, the latter may be used if we need to produce samples that may be used for HLT CPU studies
  • added a cust_2023TTI_forHLT in combinedCustoms.py, which is the same as the default cust_2023TTI except that we call the "forHLT" event content

…d custom to keep digi (in case, for HLT studies)
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @EmanuelPerez for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

updated TTI customization: keep only the signal TrackingParticles; add c...

It involves the following packages:

SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @Degano, @mdhildreth, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@andersonjacob, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@andersonjacob
Copy link
Contributor

merge

tests pass that normally pass.

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2014
updated TTI customization: keep only the signal TrackingParticles; add c...
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit e46f478 into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC Mar 29, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants