Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix HGCalValidation for different Tracksers collections #31695

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Oct 8, 2020

Conversation

ebrondol
Copy link
Contributor

@ebrondol ebrondol commented Oct 7, 2020

PR description:

Currently the makeHGCalValidationPlots.py does not produce different plots for different Tracksters collections in input, but it takes only the first folder given in input [1].

This is clearly visible in the HGCal release validation looking, for example, at the comparison between CMSSW_11_2_0_pre6_ROOT622_vs_CMSSW_11_2_0_pre6 the plots produced for "Electromagnetic multiclusters" and "Hadronic multiclusters" are identical. For example the NumberofMultiClusters in Zprime [here and here].

With this PR, the problem is solved by replacing the name of the folder in DQMData/Run 1/HGCAL/Run summary/HGCalValidator in the DQM file.with the correct collection name.

[1] https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Validation/RecoTrack/python/plotting/plotting.py#L2902-L2912

PR validation:

These changes are not impacting any workflows.
Additional check were performed on the HGCalValidation output and can be found here:
http://ebrondol.web.cern.ch/ebrondol/HGCal/fixHGCalValidation_collections/20201005/

Informing @rovere and @apsallid

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31695/18848

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @ebrondol (Erica Brondolin) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Validation/HGCalValidation

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@vandreev11, @deguio, @sethzenz, @bsunanda, @rovere, @lgray, @cseez, @apsallid, @pfs, @lecriste, @hatakeyamak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

jfernan2 commented Oct 7, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2020

+1
Tested at: 6849d21
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-029759/9775/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-07-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-029759/9775/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2542225
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2542194
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

jfernan2 commented Oct 8, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 8, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 8, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7966984 into cms-sw:master Oct 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants