Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean BuildFiles in EventFilter #31898

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2020
Merged

Clean BuildFiles in EventFilter #31898

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2020

Conversation

guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Another quick partially automatic BuildFile cleaning PR in the style of many before (for example #31830).

This BuildFile cleaning was non-trivial because the affected packages included files from different plugins directories. These illegal includes had to be fixed for the automatic BuildFile cleaning to work out.

As always, only the dependencies which are not included in any of the sources are removed, so these changes are orthogonal and complementary to the recent PRs which added all packages that are actually included.

PR validation:

CMSSW compiles. It was checked that all newly added dependencies are actually required by the package with git grep.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31898/19307

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/L1TMonitor
EventFilter/CSCTFRawToDigi
EventFilter/L1TXRawToDigi

@benkrikler, @kmaeshima, @andrius-k, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @battibass this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 22, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: a576efc
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-651cc2/10203/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-21-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-651cc2/10203/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544110
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544081
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @rekovic, is this change okay for you? Some files were moved around to avoid illegal includes from the plugins directory.

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/l1-l2 do you have any comments?
Please let us know if you prefer either to move the header files to interface (ie. merge thsi PR) or to remove the dependencies from EventFilter/L1TXRawToDigi/plugins/*h in DQM/L1TMonitor/src/L1TStage2CaloLayer1.cc

@guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually the problem is not only the dependency in DQM/L1TMonitor/src/L1TStage2CaloLayer1.cc, but also the dependency in EventFilter/L1TXRawToDigi/test.

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/l1-l2 please review/sign

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Nov 3, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 3, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants