Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PDF sets to nano, prioritize by order in LHE file #31946

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 9, 2020

Conversation

kdlong
Copy link
Contributor

@kdlong kdlong commented Oct 26, 2020

PR description:

Switch loops in nanoaod producer so that PDF sets are prioritized
by the order in the file, not the order in the config. Now chooses the
first PDF set in the file which is part of the list of "approved" sets
in the config. Also adds additional sets to this list

PR validation:

Checked that the logic works in a few files

Switch loops in nanoaod producer so that PDF sets are prioritized
by the order in the file, not the order in the config. Now chooses the
first PDF set in the file which is part of the list of "approved" sets
in the config. Also adds additional sets to this list
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31946/19392

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kdlong (Kenneth Long) for master.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/NanoAOD

@cmsbuild, @santocch, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc, @peruzzim, @swertz this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 27, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@agrohsje
Copy link

Hi Kenneth.
Two comments from my side:
1.) Should we include 90900 as used here: https://github.com/cms-sw/genproductions/pull/2729/files ?
2.) Wouldn't it make sense to have the positive PDF's first in the list. I assume older request like the top ones won't have 325300, but 306000. Searches might have both and prefer to use 325300.
Cheers, Alexander.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: b4900fd
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f19dac/10306/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-26-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

assign generators

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: generators

@alberto-sanchez,@SiewYan,@GurpreetSinghChahal,@mkirsano,@agrohsje you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f19dac/10306/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544110
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544081
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 6, 2020

+1
Tested at: 8dca3af
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f19dac/10550/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-11-06-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 6, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 6, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f19dac/10550/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544144
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544115
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

+xpog

move the default PDF to NNPDF

  1. size increase is documented here
    Add PDF sets to nano, prioritize by order in LHE file #31946 (comment)
  2. validation plots are here
    Add PDF sets to nano, prioritize by order in LHE file #31946 (comment)

@santocch
Copy link

santocch commented Nov 8, 2020

+1

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

@agrohsje
please review and sign

@agrohsje
Copy link

agrohsje commented Nov 9, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants