Ecal DB payload comparison viewer

[jeanfay]

PR description:

New features in DB PayloadInspector to compare IOVs in 2 different tags

PR validation:

Tests done in command line with getPayloadData.py, plots (png) correctly produced

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

• verify that the PR is really intended for the chosen branch
• verify that changes follow CMS Naming, Coding, And Style Rules
• verify that the PR passes the basic test procedure suggested in the CMSSW PR instructions

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33930/23007

• This PR adds an extra 64KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File CondCore/EcalPlugins/plugins/EcalFloatCondObjectContainerUtils.h modified in PR(s): [RFC] Test clang-tidy --checks misc-definitions-in-headers #33366

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jeanfay (Fay) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/EcalPlugins

@ggovi, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rchatter, @simonepigazzini, @mmusich, @thomreis, @argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[silviodonato]

@jeanfay please fix the PR title to something more descriptive. Please also attach the .png you mentioned in the PR description

[qliphy]

@jeanfay See above comment from @silviodonato , please also attach the .png you mentioned in the PR description

[qliphy]

From Jean:
"one example among many others :
"

[ggovi]

+1
Too early, waiting for test results...

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-033a07/15771/summary.html
COMMIT: 03363a5
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-06-08-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/33930/15771/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2862520
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2862491
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 37 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[qliphy]

+1

[ggovi]

+1