add parameters for dealing w/ strip mono layers (useful for confDB)

[mtosi]

add parameters MTIB, MTID, MTEC and MTOB for dealing w/ strip mono layers
this is needed for having them in confDB

[mtosi]

@Martin-Grunewald @perrotta @cerati @rovere

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

add parameters for dealing w/ strip mono layers (useful for confDB)

It involves the following packages:

RecoTracker/TkSeedingLayers

@nclopezo, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @gpetruc, @cerati, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[Martin-Grunewald]

Hi,

You should probably also fix up:
RecoTracker/TkSeedingLayers/python/PixelAndStripLayerPairs_cfi.py
and
RecoTracker/TkSeedingLayers/python/TobTecLayerPairs_cfi.py
for the added PSets.

[mtosi]

@cerati @rovere @Martin-Grunewald

could I change the above configuration in something like

from RecoTracker.TkSeedingLayers.seedingLayersEDProducer_cfi import *
PixelLessLayerPairs = seedingLayersEDProducer.clone()
PixelLessLayerPairs.layerList = cms.vstring( ...)
PixelLessLayerPairs.layerList = cms.vstring( ...)
etc.

?

[Martin-Grunewald]

That would ensure things are always in sync!

[mtosi]

@Martin-Grunewald @cerati @rovere
I've just updated the PR
the seed layers configurations import from the main one
w/ the idea of having them always in synch

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #3421 was updated. @nclopezo, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @Degano can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3421/970/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3421/970/summary.html

[mtosi]

ciao,
any chance for having it integrated w/in pre7 ?
it would be really helpful .... thanks
@perrotta @Martin-Grunewald @rovere @cerati @fwyzard

[slava77]

+1

for #3421 6c43a75

tested in CMSSW_7_1_X_2014-04-23-0200
(test area sign352)
no regressions observed on short matrix tests

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?