New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apply task chains to more code in FWCore/Framework #34697
Conversation
sentry.completedSuccessfully(); | ||
status->setResumer(std::move(iResumer)); | ||
|
||
auto group = task.group(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NOTE: I think in a latter PR this routine should be subdivided into smaller functions which would be called by this routine.
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34697/24325
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages:
@makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
iTask.doneWaiting(*iPtr); | ||
} | ||
}; | ||
return wrapped; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would
return [f = std::forward<F>(iF>)](...){...};
work?
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-619a4a/17353/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
@cmsbuild, please test Let's retest to be really sure |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-619a4a/17812/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Just to confirm explicitly that the tests look ok. |
+1 |
PR description:
Looked for places where edm::make_waiting_task could be replaced with use of edm::waiting_task::chain constructs.
PR validation:
Code compiles and framework unit tests all pass.
resolves cms-sw/framework-team#209