New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracker Phase2 Digitizer framework update for BrickedPixel #35173
Tracker Phase2 Digitizer framework update for BrickedPixel #35173
Conversation
…xel algorithm for the inner pixel tracker
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35173/25099
|
A new Pull Request was created by @suchandradutta (Suchandra Dutta) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @civanch, @srimanob, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-99c40f/18345/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ | |||
|
|||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you need 2 newlines here?
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35173/25104
|
Pull request #35173 was updated. @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @civanch, @srimanob, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again. |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35173/25150
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35173/25152
|
Pull request #35173 was updated. @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @civanch, @srimanob, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-99c40f/18443/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1 |
@srimanob @AdrianoDee the only update since last upgrade signature here is a namespace renamed with a lower case initial. I imagine that this won't change your evaluation, but please sign to confirm it if so, |
+upgrade (Only minor changes since last review) |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Updating Phase2 Tracker Digitizer framework to include Bricked Pixel algorithm for the Inner Tracker (IT). The algorithm gets
activated for the phase 2 tracker geometry (T27) containing bricked pixels in TEPX&TFPX, as well as the central 1 (3) rod(s) of
TBPX L2 (L3 and 4). The detailed description of the geometry and corresponding changes got included in the PR#34120 . This update do not have any impact on the Outer Tracker digis (verified with Phase2 DQM plots). Attaching a few slides for the IT distributions.
BrickedPR.pdf
PR validation:
Validation done using SingleMuFlatPt2To100 events (runTheMatrix workflow 39104.0). No change observed in Digi DQM distributions for OT, as expected.
Verified that the PR passes the basic test procedure suggested in the CMSSW PR instructions
@emiglior @franzglessgen