New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Throw an exception if a module requiring synchronization on lumi boundaries is used when concurrent lumis are enabled #35326
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35326/25367
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages:
@makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: AddOn AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ...Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
0a2e752
to
0910e65
Compare
@cmsbuild, please abort |
Nope, not like this |
3e4c56b
to
9ab1bbf
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35326/25742
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
Pull request #35326 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c4b1fc/19385/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
PR description:
Following the completion of #25090. This PR simply turns an existing warning to an exception. It also addresses framework unit tests that would fail because of the exception. It is possible that some unit tests in other packages would fail too (in which case I'll address those separately).
Resolves cms-sw/framework-team#121
PR validation:
Framework unit tests run.