Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Beamspot DIP server (normal DQM client) #35433

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 29, 2021

Conversation

francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

@francescobrivio francescobrivio commented Sep 27, 2021

PR description:

Forwardport of #35428.
Integrates the former java DIP BeamSpot server as a DQM client:

  • By default raeds the value from the txt files
  • An option to read the Legacy BeamSpotonline from the DB is added. but not used by default

More details in #35428 and #35193 (comment)
I profit of this PR to remove a couple of commented out lines.

PR validation:

Compiles on lxplus + see #35428

Backport

This is the forward port of #35428.

FYI @sikler

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35433/25564

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35433/25566

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/BeamMonitor (dqm)
  • DQM/Integration (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @jfernan2, @rvenditti, @pbo0, @pmandrik can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @batinkov, @battibass this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a29d19/19151/summary.html
COMMIT: 5833f9c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-27-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35433/19151/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211080
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 11
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211046
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 28, 2021

urgent

  • my understanding from Francesco was that this is needed for the beam tests, i.e. the backport should be in the 12_0_2

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #35433 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @jfernan2, @rvenditti, @pbo0, @pmandrik can you please check and sign again.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Sep 28, 2021

@perrotta , @qliphy , although I have restarted the test but last commit is just a technical cleanup, so if urgently needed, please feel free to merge this PR. @cms-sw/dqm-l2 has already signed the previous changes

Thank you @smuzaffar
However I am still waiting for the results of the supposedly ongoing validation at P5 before signing, as for the rest it was only certified that it "compiles runs on lxplus without warning or error message": unless @cms-sw/dqm-l2 or @francescobrivio tell us that we don't need to wait for those tests to complete in order to merge this master version of the PR.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35433/25606

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #35433 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @jfernan2, @rvenditti, @pbo0, @pmandrik can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a29d19/19202/summary.html
COMMIT: b716e85
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-27-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35433/19202/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211080
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211058
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Backport 35428 tested in Online DQM at P5

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants