Add HLT75e33 step to Phase-2 workflows

[srimanob]

PR description:

This PR is to add Phase2 HLT75e33 to Phase-2 workflow. It needs #37162.

PR validation:

Output from the following runTheMatrix works,
runTheMatrix.py --what upgrade -l 39434.75 -t 8 --wm init

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

After agree on the way to implement, we will need to backport to 12_3_X

[srimanob]

code-checks

[srimanob]

@smuzaffar Do I miss any change to make the code-check for PR test happen? Thanks.

[smuzaffar]

no you did not miss any change. github itself is going through a bad time ( https://www.githubstatus.com/ ) that is why bot is not reacting to and command

[smuzaffar]

looks like github is coming back , bot has started the code checks now

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37324/28968

• This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): DeepSC algorithm for ECAL SuperClusters #37115, Dynamic Reduction Network for photon energy regression in miniAOD using the SonicTriton service #37134, Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532

[srimanob]

test parameters:

• pull_request = Porting HLT Phase 2 simplified menu to 12_4_X #37162

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[srimanob]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f6ae7d/23329/summary.html
COMMIT: 9be8443
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-23-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37324/23329/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-f6ae7d/39434.911_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88_DD4hep+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HLT75e33+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3164700
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3164675
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 43 files compared)
• Checked 183 log files, 40 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

This is a side note to @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 that they will face a space increasing for D88 if run with cmsDriver after this PR is merge. Duplication of FEVTDEBUGHLT content after RECO will happen. One can remove the original production of FEVT from RECO step to save relvals space.

[kskovpen]

Thanks @srimanob . Do you have an estimate of how much it will increase in size without manual intervention in the wf configuration?

[srimanob]

You will need roughly 20 TB more per standard set of D88 NoPU+PU200. I estimate from TTbar/SUSY which needs ~1TB for GEN-SIM-RECO in both PU scenario. The output from HLT step will completely overlap with RECO with additional information of HLTX step. I assume you have the drop function in RelVals machine.

Note that, I plan to make a little update on datatier. So that we will have the same GEN-SIM-RECO for output from HLTX step, and output from RECO which will be dropped can be something else, i.e. FEVT. So, this will be transparent from user point of view.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #37324 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again.

[srimanob]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f6ae7d/23829/summary.html
COMMIT: b943152
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-04-11-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37324/23829/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-f6ae7d/39434.75_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88_HLT75e33+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HLT75e33+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3593039
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3593009
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

This PR is to add workflow for HLT Phase-2. The needed PR is fully sign, #37162

[srimanob]

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 Could you please check and sign again?

[kskovpen]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1