New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enforce Modifier consistency between Process instances #37903
Conversation
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37903/29930
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages:
@makortel, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add a test checking that the exception gets thrown?
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37903/29944
|
Pull request #37903 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please check and sign again. |
In configurations using multiple Processes, be sure later Processes do not activate any new Modifiers.
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37903/29946
|
Pull request #37903 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test SiStripDAQ_O2O_test had ERRORS ---> test test_PixelBaryCentreTool had ERRORS ---> test testSiStripDQM_OfflineTkMap had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test None of the unit tests failures appears to be related to this pull request. |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test SiStripDAQ_O2O_test had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Unit test fails in IBs |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
merge |
PR description:
In configurations using multiple Processes, be sure later Processes do not activate any new Modifiers.
PR validation:
Framework unit tests pass.