Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of cut based disriminator to SLHC branch #3879

Merged

Conversation

jpavel
Copy link
Contributor

@jpavel jpavel commented May 15, 2014

Backporting the discriminator added to 71x via #3671 to SLHC and adding it to the sequence (so that it is being run by default)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jpavel (Pavel Jez) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Backport of cut based disriminator to SLHC branch

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoTauTag/Configuration
RecoTauTag/RecoTau

@nclopezo, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @vadler, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @nhanvtran this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@andersonjacob, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@vadler
Copy link

vadler commented May 15, 2014

+1
Trivial for AT.

@andersonjacob
Copy link
Contributor

merge

passes the tests which pass

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2014
…ator

Backport of cut based disriminator to SLHC branch
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit b2aec9a into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC May 16, 2014
@jpavel jpavel deleted the SLHC_taus_CutBasedAntiEDiscriminator branch May 23, 2014 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants