Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12.4.X] Move DiMuonMassBiasClient to a regular harvesting path #39248

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Aug 30, 2022

backport of #39217

PR description:

Inspired by the discussion at #39180 (comment) I move the DiMuonMassBiasClient to a regular harvesting path, actually into the DQMHarvestMuon sequence which as per autoDQM is run in the @muon sequence

'muon': ['DQMOfflineMuon',
'PostDQMOffline',
'DQMHarvestMuon+DQMCertMuon'],

that would be run at Tier-0 for the Muon PD (cf also: https://github.com/dmwm/T0/blob/0f4f9d27c5366da57c456c4ae01da81c75524595/etc/ProdOfflineConfiguration.py#L698)

I profit of this PR to remove remove useless DMQToken produce and consumes as pointed out in #39180 (comment)

PR validation:

Run successfully several workflows that were failing before issue #39180 was solved in threading mode:

runTheMatrix.py -nel 1000.0,10042.0,10842.0 -j 8 -t 4

EDIT:
unfortunately I could not find a RelVal workflow in the matrix that mimics Tier0 in this respect (i.e. that runs ALCA:TkAlDiMuonAndVertex in the same step as DQM and then a regular harvesting, so I've created one for this purpose: 1002.4.

after that I've tested with :

runTheMatrix.py -l 1002.4 -t 4 -j 8 --ibeos

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

backport of #39217 needed for data-taking purposes.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 30, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)
  • DQMOffline/Alignment (dqm)
  • DQMOffline/Configuration (dqm)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @kskovpen, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @trtomei, @threus, @beaucero, @slomeo, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 30, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflow = 1002.4
  • relvals_opt = --what cleanedupgrade,standard,highstats,pileup,generator,extendedgen,production,ged,machine,premix

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 30, 2022

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d57ece/27186/summary.html
COMMIT: caa6b22
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-08-29-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39248/27186/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_0 had ERRORS
---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_110 had ERRORS
---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_180 had ERRORS
---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_160 had ERRORS
and more ...

RelVals

RelVals-INPUT

@mmusich mmusich force-pushed the moveDiMuonMassBiasClientToHarvestingPath_12_4_X branch from caa6b22 to 1ec6145 Compare August 30, 2022 09:31
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #39248 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @kskovpen, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 30, 2022

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d57ece/27189/summary.html
COMMIT: 1ec6145
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-08-29-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39248/27189/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-d57ece/1002.4_RunDoubleMuon2022B+RunDoubleMuon2022B+TIER0PROMPTRUN3+HARVESTPROMPTRUN3

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3677280
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3677244
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

+1

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

Backport PR.

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

+pdmv

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Sep 2, 2022

@cms-sw/orp-l2 anything that prevents the integration of this PR in 12.4.X?
It would be a desirable feature for when we restart taking data after the LHC cryo stop.

@@ -481,6 +481,8 @@
Run2022B={355130: [[1, 40]]}
steps['RunSingleMuon2022B']={'INPUT':InputInfo(dataSet='/SingleMuon/Run2022B-v1/RAW',label='2022B',events=100000,location='STD', ls=Run2022B)}
steps['RunZeroBias2022B']={'INPUT':InputInfo(dataSet='/ZeroBias/Run2022B-v1/RAW',label='2022B',events=100000,location='STD', ls=Run2022B)}
Run2022B={355680: [[21, 24]]}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was not in #39217: can you add a comment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmusich mmusich Sep 2, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well, it's needed because the PR (#38733) that added them was not backported.

@@ -3167,6 +3169,18 @@ def gen2021HiMix(fragment,howMuch):
'--era' : 'Run2_2018_pp_on_AA',
'--filetype':'DQM',
'-n':100},hiDefaults2018_ppReco])

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Steps 'HARVESTDRUN3' and 'HARVESTRUN3' were not in #39217: can you add a comment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmusich mmusich Sep 2, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well, it's needed because the PR (#38733) that added them was not backported.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Sep 2, 2022

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants