Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove MVASelector tags for tracking in MC GTs #40010

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 10, 2022

Conversation

tvami
Copy link
Contributor

@tvami tvami commented Nov 7, 2022

PR description:

Remove MVASelector tags for tracking as requested in https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/proposal-of-removal-of-bdt-based-gbrwrapperrcd-tags-for-tracking-selection-from-run-3-globaltags/16757

This is the MC part, we expect no changes in the relval test.
I also created the data GTs but bc we need to re-snapshot I'll do another PR to integrate in CMSSW.

https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_mcRun3_2022_design_v2/125X_mcRun3_2022_design_v6
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_v4/125X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_v5
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_design_deco_v2/125X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_design_deco_v3
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_realistic_deco_v4/125X_mcRun3_2022cosmics_realistic_deco_v5
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v4/125X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v5
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v4/125X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v5
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_HI_v6/125X_mcRun3_2022_realistic_HI_v7
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_mcRun4_realistic_v3/125X_mcRun4_realistic_v5

PR validation:

test parameters:
  - workflows = 12034.0,11634.0,7.23,159.0,12434.0,12834.0

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, no backport needed, maybe to 12_5_X for good GT naming

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Nov 7, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflows = 12034.0,11634.0,7.23,159.0,12434.0,12834.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 7, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40010/32952

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 7, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/AlCa (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Nov 7, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 7, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40010/32955

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 7, 2022

Pull request #40010 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 7, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-66d2d9/28839/summary.html
COMMIT: fbf70d9
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-11-07-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40010/28839/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-66d2d9/28839/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-66d2d9/28839/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /pool/condor/dir_3787/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-66d2d9/12034.0_TTbar_14TeV+2021Design+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+RecoNano+HARVESTNano
  • /pool/condor/dir_3787/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-66d2d9/7.23_Cosmics_UP21+Cosmics_UP21+DIGICOS_UP21+RECOCOS_UP21+ALCACOS_UP21+HARVESTCOS_UP21

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 52
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3867715
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3867690
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 51 files compared)
  • Checked 225 log files, 48 edm output root files, 52 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Nov 8, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflows = 159,159.02,159.03,140.56,140.58,140.6

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Nov 8, 2022

please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Nov 10, 2022

@francescobrivio I updated the PR desc, and force pushed, now the design MC GT looks good too

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Nov 10, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40010/32998

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #40010 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild cmsbuild removed the hold label Nov 10, 2022
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-66d2d9/28950/summary.html
COMMIT: 6858ef8
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-11-09-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40010/28950/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-66d2d9/140.58_RunHI2018+RunHI2018+RAWPRIMEHI18+RECOHID18APPROXCLUSTERS+HARVESTDHI18
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-66d2d9/140.6_RunHI2022+RunHI2022+RAWPRIMEHI22+RECOHID22APPROXCLUSTERS+HARVESTDHI22
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-66d2d9/159.02_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2021_ppReco+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2021_ppReco+DIGIHI2021PPRECO+RAWPRIMESIMHI18+RECOHI2021PPRECOMBAPPROXCLUSTERS+ALCARECOHI2021PPRECO+HARVESTHI2021PPRECO4
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-66d2d9/159.03_HydjetQ_MinBias_5020GeV_2021_ppReco+HydjetQ_MinBias_5020GeV_2021_ppReco+DIGIHI2021PPRECO+RAWPRIMESIMHI18+RECOHI2022PROD+MINIHI2022PROD

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 52
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3717949
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3717927
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 51 files compared)
  • Checked 230 log files, 48 edm output root files, 52 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@malbouis
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Review converged on this one, working as described.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants