Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add iEta/iX, iPhi/iY to supercluster object #40434

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

swagata87
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This is a continuation of #40327. As mentioned there, in this PR the variables iEta, iPhi, iX and iY are added directly to the Supercluster object, so that they can be accessed from AOD/miniAOD-based analysis setups in a more convenient, easy and user-friendly way.

PR validation:

Checked with workflow 2500.601

FYI @Sam-Harper

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 6, 2023

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40434/33575

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40434/33611

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @swagata87 (Swagata Mukherjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DataFormats/EgammaReco (reconstruction)
  • PhysicsTools/NanoAOD (xpog)

@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper, @jainshilpi, @Prasant1993, @rovere, @lgray, @missirol, @a-kapoor, @afiqaize, @gpetruc, @wrtabb, @sameasy, @varuns23, @sobhatta this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@swagata87 swagata87 marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2023 11:20
@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

enable nano

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

enable profiling

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

type egamma

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2023

-1

Failed Tests: Build
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9367b0/29838/summary.html
COMMIT: 49246a3
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-09-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: PROFILING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40434/29838/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Build

I found compilation error when building:

>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-09-1100/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools/src/PFEnergyCalibration.cc
>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-09-1100/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools/src/PFEnergyCalibrationHF.cc
>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-09-1100/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools/src/PFEnergyResolution.cc
>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-09-1100/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools/src/PFResolutionMap.cc
/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-09-1100/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools/src/ClusterClusterMapping.cc: In static member function 'static bool ClusterClusterMapping::overlap(const reco::CaloCluster&, const reco::CaloCluster&, float, bool)':
/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-09-1100/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterTools/src/ClusterClusterMapping.cc:17:37: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator<<' (operand types are 'std::basic_ostream' and 'const DetId')
   17 |         std::cout << " Discarding " << hits1[i1].first << " with " << hits1[i1].second << std::endl;
      |         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^~
      |                   |
      |                   std::basic_ostream
In file included from /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/sw/x86_64/nweek-02767/el8_amd64_gcc11/external/gcc/11.2.1-f9b9dfdd886f71cd63f5538223d8f161/include/c++/11.2.1/iostream:39,


@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor

vlimant commented Jan 9, 2023

looks like an error related to the IB @perrotta @rappoccio

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40434/33621

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2023

Pull request #40434 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo, @swertz, @vlimant can you please check and sign again.

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 9, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9367b0/29853/summary.html
COMMIT: 38517ba
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-09-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: PROFILING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40434/29853/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 32 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555538
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1214
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3554302
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@swertz
Copy link
Contributor

swertz commented Jan 10, 2023

+xpog

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction
Only spurious changes to comparisons from wf 11634 as described in issue #39803
Otherwise, this PR is a cleanup, simplifying access to kinematic variables of superclusters

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants