Make sure files are at CERN also when specifying multiple runs. #4075
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ktf (Giulio Eulisse) for CMSSW_7_2_X. Make sure files are at CERN also when specifying multiple runs. It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @nclopezo, @vlimant, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @Degano, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
Bypassing operations. Tests are currently broken. @davidlange6 complain if not ok. The same fix should probably be applied to 70X and 71X. |
ktf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2014
Make sure files are at CERN also when specifying multiple runs.
|
+1 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will solve the issue with 4.68 where only one of the two runs (the second one) has data files at CERN. Given we already do that for single run tests, I do not see any drawbacks. A proper solution probably should allow for site to be specified as runTheMatrix option.