Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport FastSim refiner network for NANO (DeepJet for AK4 CHS Jets) #40828
Backport FastSim refiner network for NANO (DeepJet for AK4 CHS Jets) #40828
Changes from 2 commits
4b674c9
64d138d
1bc1563
34f1ebe
8657ffe
42ac076
843898a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please remove that comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the
cuda
should be removed to avoid confusion (there is no CUDA support for ONNX in 10_6_X).Alternatively the whole
Backend
enum is unnecessary.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed
cuda
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm surprised the tests succeeded. I don't see the implementation of
defaultSessionOptions()
function anywhere, and thus I don't understand how the call fromBaseMVACache
constructor passes linker. Maybe because nothing seems to useBaseMVACache
constructor.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch... the
BaseMVACache
doesn't even exist in the original BaseMVAValueMapProducer.h.I had not realized how much these had diverged between 10_6 and 13_0... @sbein is there any reason we couldn't add the customization to relval workflows, as in #40553, and retrigger the tests here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added the Run 2 NANO recipes, including the one for testing the refinement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that, as suggested, the
Backend
enum anddefaultSessionOptions
could be omitted in the backport since they're not used anywhere