New fastsim event content for pileup #4197
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
A new Pull Request was created by @giamman (Andrea Giammanco) for CMSSW_7_1_X. New fastsim event content for pileup It involves the following packages: FastSimulation/Configuration @cmsbuild, @Degano, @giamman, @lveldere, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
+1 |
davidlange6
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2014
…ileup New fastsim event content for pileup
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces a new event content for FastSim, called FASTPU, to be used with the new pileup scheme.
More information in this PPD talk (slide 16 is related to the event content):
https://indico.cern.ch/event/317624/contribution/1/material/slides/0.pdf
This new event content should be used in a dedicated MinBias workflow like that:
(I suppose that creating a new workflow should be done by the specific experts, but if you think that I should do that, please tell me which files to modify, and which numbering convention I should follow.)
Given that the modification is really minimal, I suggest to merge this in 71x already, in order to allow PdmV to start the production of this sample, and gain time. The next step from my side, once this MinBias sample will have been created, will be to make use of the new mixing scheme in a workflow to be used for validation, as agreed during a PPD meeting.