Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hgcal v4 geometry scenario #4411

Merged

Conversation

vandreev11
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda, @pfs, @amagnan, @lgray Switch to v5 HGCAL geometry, current v4 geometry to go with a new
scenario GeometryExtended2023HGCalV4.
@ianna I hope it is done correctly. Who a person is to introduce this scenario into runTheMatrix.py workflows?
Thanks, Valeri

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @vandreev11 for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Hgcal v4 geometry scenario

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
Geometry/CMSCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @Degano, @ktf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@fratnikov, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Jun 27, 2014

@vandreev11 - you can use current workflows with an additional command at the end:
--command " --geometry Extended2023HGCalV4,Extended2023HGCalReco"

Yana

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Jun 27, 2014

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @fratnikov, @mark-grimes can you please take care of it?

@vandreev11
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ianna Thank you, Ianna. It should be then
" --geometry Extended2023HGCalV4,Extended2023HGCalMuonReco"

@fratnikov
Copy link

tested on pion samples in configurations 12261, 14261, 14461.
known problem in harvesting
however to test V4 on regular basis, this configuration should either substitute the default HGCal, or be added as yet another configuration into the matrix
@vandreev11 What is the relation of this V4 configuration with default one?

@fratnikov
Copy link

merge
so far this configuration is not in the regular test matrix

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2014
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ddbf7cc into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC Jun 27, 2014
@vandreev11
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fratnikov What is the relation of this V4 configuration with default one? - It is exactly as default configuration, except the default simulation geometry comes now from v5 directory xml files while V4 scenario takes geometry from v4 directory xml files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants