initialize members of struct to avoid problems with serialisation

[apfeiffer1]

This PR fixes a problem in the serialisatoin unit test seen in the gcc490 builds, where a
non-initialised boolean variable causing problems as it's value was -1 (oxff) while the
C++ standard allows only 0 (false) and 1 (true), and the serialisation code (the EOS
portable binary archive) expects only the standard values.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @apfeiffer1 (Andreas Pfeiffer) for CMSSW_7_2_X.

initialize members of struct to avoid problems with serialisation

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/L1TObjects

@apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @cmsbuild, @diguida, @rcastello, @ggovi, @Degano, @mulhearn can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

[apfeiffer1]

+1

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:32 PM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:

A new Pull Request was created by @apfeiffer1
https://github.com/apfeiffer1 (Andreas Pfeiffer) for CMSSW_7_2_X.

initialize members of struct to avoid problems with serialisation

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/L1TObjects

@apfeiffer1 https://github.com/apfeiffer1, @nclopezo
https://github.com/nclopezo, @cmsbuild https://github.com/cmsbuild,
@diguida https://github.com/diguida, @rcastello
https://github.com/rcastello, @ggovi https://github.com/ggovi, @Degano
https://github.com/degano, @mulhearn https://github.com/mulhearn can
you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line
of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line
of your reply.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4637 (comment).

Thanks,
cheers, andreas

[ktf]

Trusting Andreas to compile code. Merging.