New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exotica HLT validation : latest developments #5105
Conversation
… frozenHLT RelVal, whereas Run2 paths will be checked with standard RelVal.
…HLT RelVal, whereas Run2 path will be checked with standard RelVal.
…er for Run2 in hltPathsToCheck
…her for Run2 in hltPathsToCheck
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. |
Exotica HLT validation : latest developments
@ndaci could you please provide a fix and submit a new PR? runTheMatrix -l 22.0 please sent me an email if you have questions. |
Hi, sorry we are in a workshop with limited access to internet. Thanks Le jeudi 11 septembre 2014, deguio notifications@github.com a écrit :
|
#"HLT_Mu17_TkMu8_v", | ||
"HLT_Mu17_TrkIsoVVL_Mu8_TrkIsoVVL_v", | ||
"HLT_Mu17_TrkIsoVVL_TkMu8_TrkIsoVVL_v", | ||
"HLT_Mu30_TkMu11_v", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR had been reverted, and therefore it is not in the IB.
Anyhow, is it normal that you remove the monitoring of this HLT_Mu30_TkMu11 path, which is one of those requested for the Run2 HLT menu and already included in GRun since a while? Perhaps slipped out? Please check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was some confusion about the exact thresholds, this is fixed now, I'm
putting this path back.
2014-09-15 11:49 GMT+02:00 perrotta notifications@github.com:
In HLTriggerOffline/Exotica/python/analyses/hltExoticaHighPtDimuon_cff.py:
@@ -2,20 +2,15 @@
HighPtDimuonPSet = cms.PSet(
hltPathsToCheck = cms.vstring(
#"HLT_Mu17_Mu8_v",
#"HLT_Mu17_TkMu8_v",
"HLT_Mu17_TrkIsoVVL_Mu8_TrkIsoVVL_v",
"HLT_Mu17_TrkIsoVVL_TkMu8_TrkIsoVVL_v",
"HLT_Mu30_TkMu11_v",
This PR had been reverted, and therefore it is not in the IB.
Anyhow, is it normal that you remove the monitoring of this
HLT_Mu30_TkMu11 path, which is one of those requested for the Run2 HLT menu
and already included in GRun since a while? Perhaps slipped out? Please
check.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/5105/files#r17533326.
I fixed a problem in the code: the wrong collection of muons was used for the MuonNoBptx path, causing the out-of-range exception. The dimuon trigger path list was fixed as well. |
@ndaci : I see no changes in this PR. Since it results as being already merged, perhaps you have to create a new one starting from your branch |
We monitor di-electron, single electron, di-photons, single photon, di-muon paths.
The validation plots are in general reasonable, although we still need to fix some features.
We plan to fix all features and fully fix our currently buggy trigger paths (others than the paths mentioned above) by our next pull request (should come at the end of next week).
This will be extremely useful to us to help further developments to have our current version integrated in the validation workflow.