Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TrackCountingComputer update for displaced jets #5892

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Oct 22, 2014
Merged

TrackCountingComputer update for displaced jets #5892

merged 4 commits into from Oct 22, 2014

Conversation

hardenbr
Copy link
Contributor

Added functionality for tagging displaced jets using the b-tagging track counting computer at HLT. For use in confDB.

Added a minimum impact parameter cut to remove background events which low displacement but high Impact parameter significance.

Added an option to sort tracks using unsigned impact parameter significance. When the a long lived particle (X) decays to two jets and the X is not significantly boosted, one of the jets flight path can be opposite that of the (X). This produces high negative values of Impact parameter significance.

Fragments updated and existAs statements added to produce old behavior.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @hardenbr for CMSSW_7_3_X.

TrackCountingComputer update for displaced jets

It involves the following packages:

RecoBTag/ImpactParameter

@cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @StoyanStoynev, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ferencek, @acaudron, @pvmulder, @imarches this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: 0ef7d66
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
25202.0 step4

runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVEST+MINIAODMC/step4_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVEST+MINIAODMC.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5892/153/summary.html

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 20, 2014

the error seems unrelated, it's happening in other places as well #5891 (comment)

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 20, 2014

In that other PR #5891 the error went away after retest.
@cmsbuild please rerun here as well

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

indeed - seems to be new in CMSSW_7_3_X_2014-10-18-0200
@deguio, @danduggan - any thoughts about the cause?

On Oct 20, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Slava Krutelyov notifications@github.com
wrote:

the error seems unrelated, it's happening in other places as well #5891 (comment)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 How did you determine it came in on CMSSW_7_3_X_2014-10-18-0200? I just checked the IB page for that RelVal and 25202 seems to have run fine there.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

it failed here:

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/buildlogs/slc6_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_3_X_2014-10-18-0200/pyRelValMatrixLogs/run/25203.0_H130GGgluonfusion_13+H130GGgluonfusion_13INPUT+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVEST+MINIAODMC/step4_H130GGgluonfusion_13+H130GGgluonfusion_13INPUT+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVEST+MINIAODMC.log

though it seems not completely reproducible.. perhaps

david

On Oct 20, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Chris Jones notifications@github.com wrote:

@davidlange6 How did you determine it came in on CMSSW_7_3_X_2014-10-18-0200? I just checked the IB page for that RelVal and 25202 seems to have run fine there.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

@ktf Giulio, was the new patch to ROOT 5.34.18 applied at this time? Could be a side-effect of the histogram cloning change I made.

@hardenbr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just checking up on the status of this. From the looks of the error it does not seem obviously related to my changes.

@ferencek
Copy link
Contributor

Since the newly introduced parameters are not intended for b tagging and they default values restore the old behavior, I would suggest to keep the cfi files unchanged.

@hardenbr
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wanted to make sure there would be a module available with the parameters included when the confDB template is built. If I remove those parameters from the cfi files, will the default template for the TrackCountingComputer include the two new parameters?

@ferencek
Copy link
Contributor

Just as I hit the 'Comment' button I realized you might be reusing these cfi files inside the confDB. I'm not very familiar with confDB so I'm not sure if you can introduce new parameters there. I would assume that the default template for the TrackCountingComputer would not include new parameters unless they were already included in the existing cfi files but I might wrong about that.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 22, 2014

+1

for #5892 0ef7d66

tested in CMSSW_7_3_X_2014-10-21-0200 (test area sign442)

the code compiles and runs and produces no differences as expected, high stat tests were not run

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes (but tests are reportedly failing). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

nclopezo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2014
RecoBTag/ImpactParameter -- TrackCountingComputer update for displaced jets
@nclopezo nclopezo merged commit 162bd7d into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_3_X Oct 22, 2014
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants